Simple comparison of Cassandra and ScyllaDB
| Feature | Cassandra | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| Implementation | Java | C++ |
| Performance | Good, but higher latencies | High performance, low latencies |
| Resource Utilization | Requires more nodes | Fewer nodes needed |
| Administration | Manual tuning required | Automated tuning |
| Compatibility | Native | API-compatible with Cassandra |
| Data Model | Tables, rows, columns | Tables, rows, columns |
| Query Language | CQL | CQL |
| Unique Features | Standard features | Materialized views, global secondary indexes |
| Use Cases | High write throughput, scalability | Data-intensive apps, low latency |
No comments:
Post a Comment